Prof. Lisa Disch
LDISCH@POLISCI.UMN.EDU
Social Science Tower 1472: 6-7825
410 Ford Hall: 4-9809
Hours: Tuesdays 2:15-3:30 (SST)
Thursdays 2:15-3:30 (410 Ford)
T. A. Matt Weidenfeld
MWEIDEN@POLISCI.UMN.EDU
Social Science Tower 1368: 4-4029
COURSE DESCRIPTION
What is the most important feature of democracy? That it protects your rights? That it gives you an
opportunity to participate in the process of government? In this intermediate-level course, designed for
undergraduate majors and non-majors in political science, we examine a range of answers to this
question through primary texts from the history of political thought. We also link those texts to problems
and dilemmas of contemporary politics. This course is designed to foster critical thinking about the
limits of democracy and citizenship under contemporary social conditions. It also seeks to realize a
modestly democratic ethos in the classroom. To that end, we will use participatory learning strategies
including peer work groups, critical response papers, and group discussion days on which students are
primarily responsible for teaching the assigned material.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
This is a liberal arts course whose principal objective is for students to deepen their appreciation for the
texts of John Locke, James Madison, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, J. S. Mill and Karl Marx by putting those
texts to work on their worlds. We will realize this objective, in part, through close reading. These are
dense and difficult texts; your weekly reading load is calculated to encourage you to read them more than
once. We will also realize the objective by banishing mid-term and final exams, which principally test
for mastery of content, in favor of two kinds of writing assignments that develop critical thinking,
together with its expression in clear, cogent writing. To build comprehension skills, students will write
five microthemes over the course of the semester. To promote critical reasoning, students will write
three preparation papers.
REQUIRED TEXTS
(available at H. D. Smith Bookstore in Blegen Hall basement)
John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, ed. Elizabeth Rappaport (Indianapolis: Hackett).
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, On the Social Contract, trans. Donald A. Cress (Indianapolis: Hackett).
**Copies Packet available at Paradigm Course Resource (Dinkydale Dome; 1501 Washington Ave, SE).
OFFICE HOURS
Tu 2:15 - 3:30 1472 Social Science Tower; 6-7825
Th 2:15 - 3:30 410 Ford Hall (CAFS Office); 4-9809
If you have a question or problem between office-hour days, I encourage you to communicate with me by
e-mail, which I check every weekday. Please do not submit your assignments by e-mail.
ACCESSIBILITY
If you have a condition that affects your ability to participate fully in class or to meet all course
requirements, please speak with me after the first day of class so that we can work together to arrange
appropriate accommodations. This syllabus and other course materials can be made available in alternate
formats.
COURSE EXPECTATIONS
1. Read the syllabus thoroughly.
2. Read assigned texts and articles in time for their presentation in class.
3. Attend class and participate actively, in ways that are constructive and respectful of me as well as
your classmates.
4. Participate in a "participatory learning" group in class with two or three other students on a regular
basis. In addition to your own learning, you will also be responsible for the learning of your group
mates. It is up to you to ensure that they get something interesting and useful from this course.
5. Complete five microthemes on time.
6. Complete three preparation papers on time.
ASSIGNMENTS
Microthemes
A microtheme is a short (approx 300 word), focused response to a single question that trains students to
summarize an argument or section of an argument for an audience of imagined readers who are
unfamiliar with it. It can also be a response to a critical question that trains students in persuasive
writing. This task builds reading comprehension skills, gives practice in following and formulating
arguments, and prepares students to write critical essays of their own.
We put few comments on microthemes. Instead, we score microthemes according to precise criteria,
specified in advance, so that your score gives you a clear idea of what you did well and where you need
improvement. In addition, we will xerox and distribute high-scoring microthemes (with names removed)
to serve as an example for next time. In sum, microthemes are more like a running mid-term/final
examination than they are like an essay. In contrast to a mid-term or final examination, however, we
expect clear and precise writing, specific page references, and creativity. NOTE: microthemes must be
typed and submitted on one side of a 5" x 8" index card.
Preparation Papers
A preparation paper is a short critical essay in response to a focused discussion question. Although its
focus is not comprehension, it presupposes that you have mastered the key concepts of a reading or group
of readings, and can converse fluently about them. Preparation papers are due three times this semester,
on days when we break into peer work groups. The papers take the place of my lecture and must be
prepared on time; they provide the basis for the in-class work of group discussion.
Participatory Learning Groups
Participatory learning is the classroom use of structured small group interaction so that students work
together to maximize their own and each other's learning. Despite considerable research which
demonstrates that participatory learning is superior to traditional lecturing for developing students'
higher-level reasoning and fostering positive relationships among students, it is infrequently practiced at
the college level, particularly at large public universities such as this one. In this class we will make use
of peer work groups of 3 or 4 students each.
A peer work group is not the same as a small discussion group. It has a precisely organized structure
which consists of five basic elements. 1) Positive interdependence which means organizing tasks so that
members must work together to succeed. We will achieve this by role differentiation within the group.
2) Face-to-face interaction which simply involves devoting some part of class time to group work. 3)
Individual accountability which is achieved through individualized measures of participation and
achievement (the preparation paper). 4) Teaching social skills by clearly spelling out the different group
roles and monitoring performance. 5) Group process involves devoting a few minutes at the end of a
group exercise for members to evaluate how well the group is working.
At least three days this semester we will break into peer work groups for a majority of the class session
(about 1 hour of group work and 15 minutes of wrap-up discussion). I will not lecture on group days.
Instead, you will be responsible for presenting the material to each other, and for engaging in a critical
discussion. To ensure that these days are productive, you will write preparation papers for these days.
Preparation papers are an individual assignment, prepared prior to class. In class, each group will also do
a group assignment (a worksheet) that records your group discussion, and helps you put your thoughts in
order for the large-group wrap-up.
Informal in-class writing
Occasionally, as a stimulus to class discussion, we will do informal writing (on a question you will have
received in advance). These assignments will not be graded. They will be collected, and we will record
the fact that you did (or did not do) them.
GRADING
I observe CLA standards for grading.
Determination of Final Grade
Your grade will be based on a straight scale. The microtheme and preparation paper assignments are
weighted as follows:
5 Microthemes @ 15 points
3 Preparation Papers @ 15 points
Total Points for Class = 120
Extensions and Absences
Microthemes are due at the end of class. Late Microthemes will lose one point for every weekday they
are late. Extensions for microthemes can be arranged only in the case of a doctor-certified illness.
Because preparation papers are assignments to prepare you for an in-class exercise, they must be finished
by the beginning of class. They are of little use to you and your classmates if you do not attend class the
day they are due, and submit them on time. Consequently, extensions for preparation papers cannot be
arranged, and a more serious late penalty is assessed. Your preparation paper will lose three points if
you missed class on the assigned day, or did not come to class with finished paper in hand. Preparation
papers will lose one point for every additional weekday they are late.
Incompletes
I do not grant incompletes except under the most extraordinary of circumstances.
DAILY SCHEDULE OF ASSIGNMENTS
Jan 18 Introduction; no reading.
What Kind of Democracy is This?
Jan 20 **Joan Didion, "Slouching Towards Bethlehem."
Reading Questions: Imagine that the first stanza of the Yeats poem describes the Old
World's reaction to the American Revolution (it doesn't-just imagine). Why might the
spectre of an experiment in self-government inspire such a response? What did Haight-Ashbury stand for in the 1960s? What do you associate with it? Did Didion find political
meaning in Haight-Ashbury? Did she "sell anyone out" in writing this essay? What
stands at the corner of Haight and Ashbury today?
Jan 25 **Declaration of Independence & U. S. Constitution
Reading Questions: What is the most important feature of democracy to you: that it
protects your rights? That it gives you an opportunity to participate in government, or
to express oppposition? Which of these was this government designed to do best?
Jan 27 **Federalist #9, #10
Reading Questions: What are the federalists afraid of? What metaphors do they use to
describe it? What is the "first object" of government, according to Madison (#10)?
What is a "faction"? What does Madison mean by "representation"?
Feb 1 **Federalist #14, #39, #51
First Microtheme Due
Feb 3 **Essays of Brutus
Feb 8 **Lani Guinier, "The Tyranny of the Majority," & "Groups, Representation and Race-Conscious Districting"
Feb 10 First Preparation Paper Due
Citizenship as Civic Duty
Feb 15 Jean-Jacques Rousseau, On the Social Contract:
Book I: read all.
Feb 17 Rousseau, Book I: chapters 6-9 (read again); Book II: chapters 1, 3, 4, 6
Second Microtheme Due
Feb 22 Rousseau, Book II: chapters 8-11; Book III: chapters 12-15
**Carole Pateman, "Rousseau, John Stuart Mill, and G.D.H. Cole: A Participatory
Theory of Democracy."
Feb 23 Lobby Day at the Capitol (tentative): 1:00 - 3:00 pm.
Feb 24 No class (as compensation for Lobby Day).
Feb 29 **Michael Pollan, "Town-Building is no Mickey Mouse Operation" (informal writing
in-class).
Where does the public good stop and individuality begin?
Mar 2 J.S. Mill, On Liberty, pp. 1-33.
Mar 7 J. S. Mill, pp. 33-71.
Mar 9 J.S. Mill, pp. 73-91.
Third Microtheme Due
Citizenship vs. Dependency: Is it literally the rights of Men?
Mar 14 **Carole Pateman, "The Fraternal Social Contract"
Mar 16 **Nancy Fraser and Linda Gordon, "A Genealogy of Dependency: Tracing a Keyword of
the U. S. Welfare State."
Mar 21 **Nancy Fraser, "Gender Equity and the Welfare State: A Postindustrial Thought
Experiment"
Second Preparation Paper Due
Are individual liberty and market freedom compatible? (Or, Can "the individual" survive in a
commodified world?)
Mar 23 **John Locke, "Selections" from Second Treatise of Government, read all.
Mar 27-31: SPRING BREAK
April 4 **Locke, re-read Chapter V
Fourth Microtheme Due
April 6 **Karl Marx, Capital, pp. 125-40.
April 11 **Marx, pp. 163-77.
April 13 **Marx, pp. 270-280.
Fifth Microtheme Due
April 18 **Michael D. Smith, "The Empire Filters Back: Consumption, Production, and the
Politics of Starbuck's Coffee"
April 20 **Serra A. Tinic, "United Colors and Untied Meanings: Benetton and the
Commodification of Social Issues," and **Patricia J. Williams, "The Death of the
Profane"
Third Preparation Paper Due
April 25 Film: "Berkeley in the 60's" (Part I).
April 27 Film: "Berkeley in the 60's" (Part II).
May 2 Port Huron Statement (informal writing in class)
May 4 Last Day of Class: No reading. Return Microthemes and Preparation Papers.
Participatory learning often works best when you think specifically about what makes a group
discussion go well, enumerate the tasks that successful discussion entails, and assign those tasks to
individual group members. Think about beginning with these:
Group Processing: At the end of each group work session, it is important to assess your group
work. Pay attention to each of the roles AND to the dynamic of their relationship to each other.